DV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -17.13%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.31%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.997%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.14x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.92x versus 3.30x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -6.33%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.7%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.31%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than UiPath.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $356.6M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than UiPath's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.14x while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.92x versus 4.74x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -2.12%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.31%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.14x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.92x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -8.17%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.31%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 69.23%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.14x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.92x versus 2.73x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.