WYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of -2.12% compared to WidePoint's net margin of -17.13%. WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

WidePoint has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 135.85%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Intellinetics.

WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.997%.

WidePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WidePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WidePoint quarterly revenues are $34.2M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, WidePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WidePoint is 0.21x versus 3.30x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of -2.12% compared to WidePoint's net margin of -6.33%. WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.7%.

WidePoint has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 135.85%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than UiPath.

WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WidePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WidePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WidePoint quarterly revenues are $34.2M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $356.6M. WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K is higher than UiPath's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, WidePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WidePoint is 0.21x versus 4.74x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of -2.12% compared to WidePoint's net margin of -1.69%. WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

WidePoint has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 135.85%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $34.34 which suggests that it could grow by 31.62%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than RingCentral.

WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.829%.

WidePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WidePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WidePoint quarterly revenues are $34.2M, which are smaller than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $612.1M. WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K is higher than RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, WidePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WidePoint is 0.21x versus 0.98x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -2.12% compared to WidePoint's net margin of -568.22%. WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

WidePoint has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 135.85%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, which suggesting that the stock is 60.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WidePoint has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WidePoint pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WidePoint quarterly revenues are $34.2M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, WidePoint's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WidePoint is 0.21x versus 3.68x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.