PATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HubSpot has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of -3.05%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.39, signalling upside risk potential of 16.01%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $745.38 which suggests that it could grow by 37.64%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.598%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $714.1M. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,700.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.74x versus 10.39x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of -748.63%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -74.79%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.39, signalling upside risk potential of 16.01%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $11.81 which suggests that it could grow by 0.28%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than SoundHound AI, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than SoundHound AI.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $29.1M. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than SoundHound AI's net income of $129.9M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.74x versus 42.69x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of 1.71%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat Twilio's return on equity of -0.4%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.39, signalling upside risk potential of 16.01%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $130.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than Twilio.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.173%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than Twilio's net income of $20M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.74x versus 4.30x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -6.33% compared to UiPath's net margin of -2.12%. UiPath's return on equity of -3.7% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $14.39, signalling upside risk potential of 16.01%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $356.6M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. UiPath's net income of -$22.6M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 4.74x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.