ZETA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 1.43%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 69.23%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.42 which suggests that it could grow by 19.31%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are larger than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $165.1M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 55.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.73x versus 3.92x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HubSpot has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -3.05%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 69.23%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $745.38 which suggests that it could grow by 37.64%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.598%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $714.1M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is higher than HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,700.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.73x versus 10.39x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PubMatic has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -14.86%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat PubMatic's return on equity of 1.97%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 69.23%. On the other hand PubMatic has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.74%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than PubMatic.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PubMatic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PubMatic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are larger than PubMatic quarterly revenues of $63.8M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than PubMatic's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PubMatic's PE ratio is 152.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.73x versus 2.35x for PubMatic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -8.17% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 1.71%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58% beat Twilio's return on equity of -0.4%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 69.23%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $130.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than Twilio.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.173%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $264.4M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M is lower than Twilio's net income of $20M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.73x versus 4.30x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.