CADE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens & Northern has a net margin of 30.5% compared to Cadence Bank's net margin of 23.66%. Cadence Bank's return on equity of 12.69% beat Citizens & Northern's return on equity of 9.91%.

Cadence Bank has a consensus price target of $36.82, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand Citizens & Northern has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.38%. Given that Citizens & Northern has higher upside potential than Cadence Bank, analysts believe Citizens & Northern is more attractive than Cadence Bank.

Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens & Northern has a beta of 0.493, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.694%.

Cadence Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Citizens & Northern offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Cadence Bank pays 36.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens & Northern pays out 59.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Bank quarterly revenues are $447.4M, which are larger than Citizens & Northern quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Cadence Bank's net income of $136.4M is higher than Citizens & Northern's net income of $6.3M. Notably, Cadence Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.28x while Citizens & Northern's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Bank is 3.62x versus 2.81x for Citizens & Northern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lakeland Financial has a net margin of 30.5% compared to Cadence Bank's net margin of 31.48%. Cadence Bank's return on equity of 12.69% beat Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34%.

Cadence Bank has a consensus price target of $36.82, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand Lakeland Financial has an analysts' consensus of $66.40 which suggests that it could grow by 1.55%. Given that Cadence Bank has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe Cadence Bank is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.195%.

Cadence Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Lakeland Financial offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cadence Bank pays 36.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeland Financial pays out 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Bank quarterly revenues are $447.4M, which are larger than Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues of $63.8M. Cadence Bank's net income of $136.4M is higher than Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M. Notably, Cadence Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.28x while Lakeland Financial's PE ratio is 18.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Bank is 3.62x versus 6.55x for Lakeland Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) has a net margin of 30.5% compared to Cadence Bank's net margin of 22.21%. Cadence Bank's return on equity of 12.69% beat Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH)'s return on equity of 10.15%.

Cadence Bank has a consensus price target of $36.82, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) has an analysts' consensus of $33.17 which suggests that it could grow by 4.46%. Given that Cadence Bank has higher upside potential than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH), analysts believe Cadence Bank is more attractive than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH).

Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.089%.

Cadence Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) offers a yield of 5.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Cadence Bank pays 36.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) pays out 47.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Bank quarterly revenues are $447.4M, which are larger than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) quarterly revenues of $109.6M. Cadence Bank's net income of $136.4M is higher than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH)'s net income of $24.3M. Notably, Cadence Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.28x while Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH)'s PE ratio is 10.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Bank is 3.62x versus 2.52x for Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zions Bancorp NA has a net margin of 30.5% compared to Cadence Bank's net margin of 21.38%. Cadence Bank's return on equity of 12.69% beat Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 13.05%.

Cadence Bank has a consensus price target of $36.82, signalling upside risk potential of 5.2%. On the other hand Zions Bancorp NA has an analysts' consensus of $55.58 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that Cadence Bank has higher upside potential than Zions Bancorp NA, analysts believe Cadence Bank is more attractive than Zions Bancorp NA.

Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.354%.

Cadence Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Zions Bancorp NA offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Cadence Bank pays 36.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorp NA pays out 36.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Bank quarterly revenues are $447.4M, which are smaller than Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues of $795M. Cadence Bank's net income of $136.4M is lower than Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $170M. Notably, Cadence Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.28x while Zions Bancorp NA's PE ratio is 11.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Bank is 3.62x versus 2.62x for Zions Bancorp NA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.