COLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Interstate BancSystem has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 20.32%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.71% beat First Interstate BancSystem's return on equity of 6.61%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $26.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.02%. On the other hand First Interstate BancSystem has an analysts' consensus of $31.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.76%. Given that Columbia Banking System has higher upside potential than First Interstate BancSystem, analysts believe Columbia Banking System is more attractive than First Interstate BancSystem.

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Interstate BancSystem has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.177%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. First Interstate BancSystem offers a yield of 6.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 56.26% of its earnings as a dividend. First Interstate BancSystem pays out 86.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $491.4M, which are larger than First Interstate BancSystem quarterly revenues of $247M. Columbia Banking System's net income of $86.6M is higher than First Interstate BancSystem's net income of $50.2M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while First Interstate BancSystem's PE ratio is 14.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.57x versus 3.10x for First Interstate BancSystem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Bancshares has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 27.45%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.71% beat Huntington Bancshares's return on equity of 10.26%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $26.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.02%. On the other hand Huntington Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $19.15 which suggests that it could grow by 15.1%. Given that Huntington Bancshares has higher upside potential than Columbia Banking System, analysts believe Huntington Bancshares is more attractive than Columbia Banking System.

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Bancshares has a beta of 0.929, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.128%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Huntington Bancshares offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 56.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Bancshares pays out 53.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $491.4M, which are smaller than Huntington Bancshares quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Columbia Banking System's net income of $86.6M is lower than Huntington Bancshares's net income of $527M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Huntington Bancshares's PE ratio is 12.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.57x versus 3.26x for Huntington Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 22.21%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.71% beat Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH)'s return on equity of 10.15%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $26.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.02%. On the other hand Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) has an analysts' consensus of $33.17 which suggests that it could grow by 5.56%. Given that Columbia Banking System has higher upside potential than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH), analysts believe Columbia Banking System is more attractive than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH).

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.089%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) offers a yield of 5.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 56.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) pays out 47.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $491.4M, which are larger than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH) quarterly revenues of $109.6M. Columbia Banking System's net income of $86.6M is higher than Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH)'s net income of $24.3M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH)'s PE ratio is 9.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.57x versus 2.50x for Peoples Bancorp(Marietta OH). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 22.17%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.71% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 5.51%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $26.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.02%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $10.45 which suggests that it could grow by 12.97%. Given that Valley National Bancorp has higher upside potential than Columbia Banking System, analysts believe Valley National Bancorp is more attractive than Columbia Banking System.

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.618, which suggesting that the stock is 38.191% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.965%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.03%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 56.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 65.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $491.4M, which are larger than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $478.4M. Columbia Banking System's net income of $86.6M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $106.1M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.57x versus 2.63x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.