LKFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 27.38%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.66%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $66.40, signalling upside risk potential of 1.55%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.14%. Given that Bar Harbor Bankshares has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe Bar Harbor Bankshares is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.494%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 11.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.55x versus 3.21x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Bank has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 30.5%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat Cadence Bank's return on equity of 12.69%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $66.40, signalling upside risk potential of 1.55%. On the other hand Cadence Bank has an analysts' consensus of $36.82 which suggests that it could grow by 5.2%. Given that Cadence Bank has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe Cadence Bank is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.855%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Cadence Bank offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Bank pays out 36.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than Cadence Bank quarterly revenues of $447.4M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is lower than Cadence Bank's net income of $136.4M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Cadence Bank's PE ratio is 12.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.55x versus 3.62x for Cadence Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Savings Financial Group has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 28.13%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat First Savings Financial Group's return on equity of 11.25%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $66.40, signalling upside risk potential of 1.55%. On the other hand First Savings Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.83 which suggests that it could grow by 18.59%. Given that First Savings Financial Group has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe First Savings Financial Group is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Savings Financial Group has a beta of 0.386, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.377%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. First Savings Financial Group offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. First Savings Financial Group pays out 29.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are larger than First Savings Financial Group quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is higher than First Savings Financial Group's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while First Savings Financial Group's PE ratio is 9.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.55x versus 2.34x for First Savings Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virginia National Bankshares has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 31.94%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 13.34% beat Virginia National Bankshares's return on equity of 11.13%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $66.40, signalling upside risk potential of 1.55%. On the other hand Virginia National Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lakeland Financial has higher upside potential than Virginia National Bankshares, analysts believe Lakeland Financial is more attractive than Virginia National Bankshares.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.195% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virginia National Bankshares has a beta of 0.513, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.715%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Virginia National Bankshares offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Virginia National Bankshares pays out 41.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are larger than Virginia National Bankshares quarterly revenues of $14.1M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $20.1M is higher than Virginia National Bankshares's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.68x while Virginia National Bankshares's PE ratio is 11.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.55x versus 3.72x for Virginia National Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.