PGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Progressive's net margin of 29.38%. Progressive's return on equity of 34.35% beat BlackRock's return on equity of 13.88%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $286.0733, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand BlackRock has an analysts' consensus of $1,162.27 which suggests that it could grow by 7.4%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than BlackRock, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than BlackRock.

Progressive has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock has a beta of 1.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.186%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. BlackRock offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.21 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock pays out 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are larger than BlackRock quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Progressive's net income of $2.6B is higher than BlackRock's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.62x while BlackRock's PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.84x versus 7.77x for BlackRock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Progressive's net margin of 7.67%. Progressive's return on equity of 34.35% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $286.0733, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.83%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than CNA Financial.

Progressive has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.933%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Progressive's net income of $2.6B is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $274M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.62x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.84x versus 0.84x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Progressive's net margin of 3.35%. Progressive's return on equity of 34.35% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $286.0733, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $281.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.51%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Progressive has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.316%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Progressive's net income of $2.6B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.62x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 13.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.84x versus 1.24x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Progressive's net margin of 11.84%. Progressive's return on equity of 34.35% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $286.0733, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $71.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.19%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Progressive has a beta of 0.369, which suggesting that the stock is 63.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.415, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.545%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Progressive pays 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $20.4B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Progressive's net income of $2.6B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.62x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.84x versus 1.96x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.