WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of -3.51%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $158.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.18%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.296%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 16.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.96x versus 2.12x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First American Financial has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 4.69%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 3.21%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 37.96%. Given that First American Financial has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe First American Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.25%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 168.35% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First American Financial's is not.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than First American Financial's net income of $74.2M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 36.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.96x versus 0.92x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 12.58%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $286.0733 which suggests that it could grow by 16.07%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.092%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Progressive's PE ratio is 16.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.96x versus 1.84x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 15.51%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat RLI's return on equity of 17.61%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.19%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $77.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.553%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. RLI offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $407.7M. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than RLI's net income of $63.2M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while RLI's PE ratio is 23.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.96x versus 3.76x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.