CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 3.62%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $229.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.15%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.511, which suggesting that the stock is 48.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.333, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.698%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Allstate's PE ratio is 13.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.84x versus 0.80x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 21.07%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 29.23%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Kinsale Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $484.67 which suggests that it could fall by -0.04%. Given that CNA Financial has higher upside potential than Kinsale Capital Group, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Kinsale Capital Group.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.511, which suggesting that the stock is 48.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.095%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Kinsale Capital Group offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 3.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Kinsale Capital Group quarterly revenues of $423.4M. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is higher than Kinsale Capital Group's net income of $89.2M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Kinsale Capital Group's PE ratio is 27.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.84x versus 6.90x for Kinsale Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.34%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Loews's return on equity of 7.5%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Loews has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -64.81%. Given that CNA Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.511, which suggesting that the stock is 48.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.798%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Loews offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews pays out 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Loews quarterly revenues of $4.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than Loews's net income of $370M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Loews's PE ratio is 14.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.84x versus 1.13x for Loews. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 12.58%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $286.0733 which suggests that it could grow by 16.07%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.511, which suggesting that the stock is 48.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.092%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Progressive offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.34x while Progressive's PE ratio is 16.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.84x versus 1.84x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.