KMUXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fiskars Oyj has a net margin of -1.72% compared to Kamux's net margin of -4.52%. Kamux's return on equity of -0.44% beat Fiskars Oyj's return on equity of 1.5%.

Kamux has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fiskars Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kamux has higher upside potential than Fiskars Oyj, analysts believe Kamux is more attractive than Fiskars Oyj.

Kamux has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiskars Oyj has a beta of 0.141, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.936%.

Kamux has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Fiskars Oyj offers a yield of 5.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Kamux pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Fiskars Oyj pays out 233.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kamux quarterly revenues are $244.7M, which are smaller than Fiskars Oyj quarterly revenues of $307.1M. Kamux's net income of -$4.2M is higher than Fiskars Oyj's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Kamux's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.40x while Fiskars Oyj's PE ratio is 111.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kamux is 0.45x versus 1.07x for Fiskars Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huhtamäki Oyj has a net margin of -1.72% compared to Kamux's net margin of 5.68%. Kamux's return on equity of -0.44% beat Huhtamäki Oyj's return on equity of 12%.

Kamux has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huhtamäki Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kamux has higher upside potential than Huhtamäki Oyj, analysts believe Kamux is more attractive than Huhtamäki Oyj.

Kamux has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huhtamäki Oyj has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.085%.

Kamux has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Huhtamäki Oyj offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Kamux pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj pays out 49.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kamux's is not.

Kamux quarterly revenues are $244.7M, which are smaller than Huhtamäki Oyj quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Kamux's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Huhtamäki Oyj's net income of $59.9M. Notably, Kamux's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.40x while Huhtamäki Oyj's PE ratio is 14.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kamux is 0.45x versus 0.83x for Huhtamäki Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harvia PLC has a net margin of -1.72% compared to Kamux's net margin of 16.09%. Kamux's return on equity of -0.44% beat Harvia PLC's return on equity of 20.92%.

Kamux has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvia PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kamux has higher upside potential than Harvia PLC, analysts believe Kamux is more attractive than Harvia PLC.

Kamux has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvia PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kamux has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Harvia PLC offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Kamux pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC pays out 52.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kamux's is not.

Kamux quarterly revenues are $244.7M, which are larger than Harvia PLC quarterly revenues of $54.7M. Kamux's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Harvia PLC's net income of $8.8M. Notably, Kamux's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.40x while Harvia PLC's PE ratio is 40.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kamux is 0.45x versus 5.58x for Harvia PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nokian Tyres PLC has a net margin of -1.72% compared to Kamux's net margin of -14.03%. Kamux's return on equity of -0.44% beat Nokian Tyres PLC's return on equity of -2.71%.

Kamux has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nokian Tyres PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kamux has higher upside potential than Nokian Tyres PLC, analysts believe Kamux is more attractive than Nokian Tyres PLC.

Kamux has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nokian Tyres PLC has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.963%.

Kamux has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Nokian Tyres PLC offers a yield of 6.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Kamux pays 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Nokian Tyres PLC pays out -315.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kamux quarterly revenues are $244.7M, which are smaller than Nokian Tyres PLC quarterly revenues of $283.6M. Kamux's net income of -$4.2M is higher than Nokian Tyres PLC's net income of -$39.8M. Notably, Kamux's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.40x while Nokian Tyres PLC's PE ratio is 177.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kamux is 0.45x versus 0.73x for Nokian Tyres PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.