Financhill
Buy
60

FKRAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$16.50
Seasonality move :
0.2%
Day range:
$16.50 - $16.50
52-week range:
$14.34 - $19.14
Dividend yield:
5.53%
P/E ratio:
111.31x
P/S ratio:
1.07x
P/B ratio:
1.74x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-10.21%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.15

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
-- -- -- -- --
AS
Amer Sports
$1.2B $0.02 18.59% 1476.3% $41.35
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$1.2B -- 5.54% -- --
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
-- -- -- -- --
KMUXF
Kamux
-- -- -- -- --
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
$16.50 -- $1.3B 111.31x $0.46 5.53% 1.07x
AS
Amer Sports
$39.27 $41.35 $21.8B 106.14x $0.00 0% 3.77x
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$35.40 -- $3.7B 14.09x $0.63 3.41% 0.83x
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
$58.73 -- $1.1B 40.92x $0.42 1.96% 5.58x
KMUXF
Kamux
$12.17 -- $485.3M 97.40x $0.11 1.5% 0.45x
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
$3.67 -- $1B 177.80x $0.14 6.68% 0.73x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
39.06% -0.556 36.58% 0.65x
AS
Amer Sports
15.11% 4.345 6.26% 0.80x
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
43.54% 0.192 40.17% 0.95x
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
42.54% 2.368 11.38% 2.40x
KMUXF
Kamux
29.43% -0.013 9.81% 0.73x
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
42.15% -0.223 100.9% 0.99x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
$145.3M -$4.8M 0.96% 1.5% -1.58% -$19.5M
AS
Amer Sports
$851.1M $214.5M 3.3% 4.51% 14.91% $49.2M
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$208.3M $98.7M 6.78% 12% 9.76% -$24.1M
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
$36.2M $12.5M 12.07% 20.92% 23.49% $9.1M
KMUXF
Kamux
$18.6M -$2.7M -0.33% -0.44% -1.12% $21.7M
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
$25M -$37.8M -1.67% -2.71% -13.32% -$182.9M

Fiskars Oyj vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or AS?

    Amer Sports has a net margin of -4.52% compared to Fiskars Oyj's net margin of 9.14%. Fiskars Oyj's return on equity of 1.5% beat Amer Sports's return on equity of 4.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    47.31% -$0.17 $1.3B
    AS
    Amer Sports
    57.8% $0.24 $6.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or AS?

    Fiskars Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amer Sports has an analysts' consensus of $41.35 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that Amer Sports has higher upside potential than Fiskars Oyj, analysts believe Amer Sports is more attractive than Fiskars Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    0 0 0
    AS
    Amer Sports
    14 3 1
  • Is FKRAF or AS More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj has a beta of 0.141, which suggesting that the stock is 85.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amer Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or AS?

    Fiskars Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. Amer Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiskars Oyj pays 233.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Amer Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or AS?

    Fiskars Oyj quarterly revenues are $307.1M, which are smaller than Amer Sports quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Fiskars Oyj's net income of -$13.9M is lower than Amer Sports's net income of $134.6M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.31x while Amer Sports's PE ratio is 106.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj is 1.07x versus 3.77x for Amer Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    1.07x 111.31x $307.1M -$13.9M
    AS
    Amer Sports
    3.77x 106.14x $1.5B $134.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Huhtamäki Oyj has a net margin of -4.52% compared to Fiskars Oyj's net margin of 5.68%. Fiskars Oyj's return on equity of 1.5% beat Huhtamäki Oyj's return on equity of 12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    47.31% -$0.17 $1.3B
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    19.77% $0.57 $4B
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Fiskars Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huhtamäki Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj has higher upside potential than Huhtamäki Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj is more attractive than Huhtamäki Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    0 0 0
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or HOYFF More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj has a beta of 0.141, which suggesting that the stock is 85.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huhtamäki Oyj has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.085%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Fiskars Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. Huhtamäki Oyj offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Fiskars Oyj pays 233.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj pays out 49.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Fiskars Oyj quarterly revenues are $307.1M, which are smaller than Huhtamäki Oyj quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Fiskars Oyj's net income of -$13.9M is lower than Huhtamäki Oyj's net income of $59.9M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.31x while Huhtamäki Oyj's PE ratio is 14.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj is 1.07x versus 0.83x for Huhtamäki Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    1.07x 111.31x $307.1M -$13.9M
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    0.83x 14.09x $1.1B $59.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Harvia PLC has a net margin of -4.52% compared to Fiskars Oyj's net margin of 16.09%. Fiskars Oyj's return on equity of 1.5% beat Harvia PLC's return on equity of 20.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    47.31% -$0.17 $1.3B
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    66.22% $0.47 $244.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Fiskars Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvia PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj has higher upside potential than Harvia PLC, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj is more attractive than Harvia PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    0 0 0
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or HRVFF More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj has a beta of 0.141, which suggesting that the stock is 85.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvia PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Fiskars Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. Harvia PLC offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Fiskars Oyj pays 233.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC pays out 52.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Fiskars Oyj quarterly revenues are $307.1M, which are larger than Harvia PLC quarterly revenues of $54.7M. Fiskars Oyj's net income of -$13.9M is lower than Harvia PLC's net income of $8.8M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.31x while Harvia PLC's PE ratio is 40.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj is 1.07x versus 5.58x for Harvia PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    1.07x 111.31x $307.1M -$13.9M
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    5.58x 40.92x $54.7M $8.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Kamux has a net margin of -4.52% compared to Fiskars Oyj's net margin of -1.72%. Fiskars Oyj's return on equity of 1.5% beat Kamux's return on equity of -0.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    47.31% -$0.17 $1.3B
    KMUXF
    Kamux
    7.61% -$0.11 $161.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Fiskars Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kamux has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj has higher upside potential than Kamux, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj is more attractive than Kamux.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    0 0 0
    KMUXF
    Kamux
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or KMUXF More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj has a beta of 0.141, which suggesting that the stock is 85.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kamux has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Fiskars Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. Kamux offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Fiskars Oyj pays 233.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Kamux pays out 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Fiskars Oyj quarterly revenues are $307.1M, which are larger than Kamux quarterly revenues of $244.7M. Fiskars Oyj's net income of -$13.9M is lower than Kamux's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.31x while Kamux's PE ratio is 97.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj is 1.07x versus 0.45x for Kamux. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    1.07x 111.31x $307.1M -$13.9M
    KMUXF
    Kamux
    0.45x 97.40x $244.7M -$4.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Nokian Tyres PLC has a net margin of -4.52% compared to Fiskars Oyj's net margin of -14.03%. Fiskars Oyj's return on equity of 1.5% beat Nokian Tyres PLC's return on equity of -2.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    47.31% -$0.17 $1.3B
    NKRKY
    Nokian Tyres PLC
    8.83% -$0.14 $2.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Fiskars Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nokian Tyres PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj has higher upside potential than Nokian Tyres PLC, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj is more attractive than Nokian Tyres PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    0 0 0
    NKRKY
    Nokian Tyres PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or NKRKY More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj has a beta of 0.141, which suggesting that the stock is 85.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nokian Tyres PLC has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.963%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Fiskars Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. Nokian Tyres PLC offers a yield of 6.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Fiskars Oyj pays 233.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Nokian Tyres PLC pays out -315.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Fiskars Oyj quarterly revenues are $307.1M, which are larger than Nokian Tyres PLC quarterly revenues of $283.6M. Fiskars Oyj's net income of -$13.9M is higher than Nokian Tyres PLC's net income of -$39.8M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 111.31x while Nokian Tyres PLC's PE ratio is 177.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj is 1.07x versus 0.73x for Nokian Tyres PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    1.07x 111.31x $307.1M -$13.9M
    NKRKY
    Nokian Tyres PLC
    0.73x 177.80x $283.6M -$39.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?

GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.

Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17

Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock