Financhill
Buy
71

HRVFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$58.73
Seasonality move :
57.34%
Day range:
$58.73 - $58.73
52-week range:
$19.30 - $58.73
Dividend yield:
1.96%
P/E ratio:
40.92x
P/S ratio:
5.58x
P/B ratio:
7.87x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
41
1-year change:
204.3%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$189.6M
EPS (TTM):
$1.44

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
-- -- -- -- --
AS
Amer Sports
$1.2B $0.02 18.59% 1476.3% $41.64
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
-- -- -- -- --
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$1.2B -- 5.54% -- --
KMUXF
Kamux
-- -- -- -- --
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
$58.73 -- $1.1B 40.92x $0.42 1.96% 5.58x
AS
Amer Sports
$39.15 $41.64 $21.7B 105.81x $0.00 0% 3.76x
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
$16.50 -- $1.3B 111.31x $0.46 5.53% 1.07x
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$35.40 -- $3.7B 14.09x $0.63 3.41% 0.83x
KMUXF
Kamux
$12.17 -- $485.3M 97.40x $0.11 1.5% 0.45x
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
$3.67 -- $1B 177.80x $0.14 6.68% 0.73x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
42.54% 2.368 11.38% 2.40x
AS
Amer Sports
15.11% 4.345 6.26% 0.80x
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
39.06% -0.556 36.58% 0.65x
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
43.54% 0.192 40.17% 0.95x
KMUXF
Kamux
29.43% -0.013 9.81% 0.73x
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
42.15% -0.223 100.9% 0.99x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
HRVFF
Harvia PLC
$36.2M $12.5M 12.07% 20.92% 23.49% $9.1M
AS
Amer Sports
$851.1M $214.5M 3.3% 4.51% 14.91% $49.2M
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj
$145.3M -$4.8M 0.96% 1.5% -1.58% -$19.5M
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$208.3M $98.7M 6.78% 12% 9.76% -$24.1M
KMUXF
Kamux
$18.6M -$2.7M -0.33% -0.44% -1.12% $21.7M
NKRKY
Nokian Tyres PLC
$25M -$37.8M -1.67% -2.71% -13.32% -$182.9M

Harvia PLC vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns HRVFF or AS?

    Amer Sports has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Harvia PLC's net margin of 9.14%. Harvia PLC's return on equity of 20.92% beat Amer Sports's return on equity of 4.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    66.22% $0.47 $244.1M
    AS
    Amer Sports
    57.8% $0.24 $6.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About HRVFF or AS?

    Harvia PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amer Sports has an analysts' consensus of $41.64 which suggests that it could grow by 6.36%. Given that Amer Sports has higher upside potential than Harvia PLC, analysts believe Amer Sports is more attractive than Harvia PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    0 0 0
    AS
    Amer Sports
    14 3 1
  • Is HRVFF or AS More Risky?

    Harvia PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amer Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRVFF or AS?

    Harvia PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Amer Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harvia PLC pays 52.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Amer Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRVFF or AS?

    Harvia PLC quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than Amer Sports quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Harvia PLC's net income of $8.8M is lower than Amer Sports's net income of $134.6M. Notably, Harvia PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Amer Sports's PE ratio is 105.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia PLC is 5.58x versus 3.76x for Amer Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    5.58x 40.92x $54.7M $8.8M
    AS
    Amer Sports
    3.76x 105.81x $1.5B $134.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns HRVFF or FKRAF?

    Fiskars Oyj has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Harvia PLC's net margin of -4.52%. Harvia PLC's return on equity of 20.92% beat Fiskars Oyj's return on equity of 1.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    66.22% $0.47 $244.1M
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    47.31% -$0.17 $1.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About HRVFF or FKRAF?

    Harvia PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fiskars Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia PLC has higher upside potential than Fiskars Oyj, analysts believe Harvia PLC is more attractive than Fiskars Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    0 0 0
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    0 0 0
  • Is HRVFF or FKRAF More Risky?

    Harvia PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiskars Oyj has a beta of 0.141, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.936%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRVFF or FKRAF?

    Harvia PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Fiskars Oyj offers a yield of 5.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Harvia PLC pays 52.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Fiskars Oyj pays out 233.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRVFF or FKRAF?

    Harvia PLC quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than Fiskars Oyj quarterly revenues of $307.1M. Harvia PLC's net income of $8.8M is higher than Fiskars Oyj's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Harvia PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Fiskars Oyj's PE ratio is 111.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia PLC is 5.58x versus 1.07x for Fiskars Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    5.58x 40.92x $54.7M $8.8M
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj
    1.07x 111.31x $307.1M -$13.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns HRVFF or HOYFF?

    Huhtamäki Oyj has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Harvia PLC's net margin of 5.68%. Harvia PLC's return on equity of 20.92% beat Huhtamäki Oyj's return on equity of 12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    66.22% $0.47 $244.1M
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    19.77% $0.57 $4B
  • What do Analysts Say About HRVFF or HOYFF?

    Harvia PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huhtamäki Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia PLC has higher upside potential than Huhtamäki Oyj, analysts believe Harvia PLC is more attractive than Huhtamäki Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    0 0 0
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    0 0 0
  • Is HRVFF or HOYFF More Risky?

    Harvia PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huhtamäki Oyj has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.085%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRVFF or HOYFF?

    Harvia PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Huhtamäki Oyj offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Harvia PLC pays 52.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj pays out 49.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRVFF or HOYFF?

    Harvia PLC quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than Huhtamäki Oyj quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Harvia PLC's net income of $8.8M is lower than Huhtamäki Oyj's net income of $59.9M. Notably, Harvia PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Huhtamäki Oyj's PE ratio is 14.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia PLC is 5.58x versus 0.83x for Huhtamäki Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    5.58x 40.92x $54.7M $8.8M
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    0.83x 14.09x $1.1B $59.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns HRVFF or KMUXF?

    Kamux has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Harvia PLC's net margin of -1.72%. Harvia PLC's return on equity of 20.92% beat Kamux's return on equity of -0.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    66.22% $0.47 $244.1M
    KMUXF
    Kamux
    7.61% -$0.11 $161.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About HRVFF or KMUXF?

    Harvia PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kamux has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia PLC has higher upside potential than Kamux, analysts believe Harvia PLC is more attractive than Kamux.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    0 0 0
    KMUXF
    Kamux
    0 0 0
  • Is HRVFF or KMUXF More Risky?

    Harvia PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kamux has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRVFF or KMUXF?

    Harvia PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Kamux offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Harvia PLC pays 52.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Kamux pays out 147.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kamux's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRVFF or KMUXF?

    Harvia PLC quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than Kamux quarterly revenues of $244.7M. Harvia PLC's net income of $8.8M is higher than Kamux's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Harvia PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Kamux's PE ratio is 97.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia PLC is 5.58x versus 0.45x for Kamux. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    5.58x 40.92x $54.7M $8.8M
    KMUXF
    Kamux
    0.45x 97.40x $244.7M -$4.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns HRVFF or NKRKY?

    Nokian Tyres PLC has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Harvia PLC's net margin of -14.03%. Harvia PLC's return on equity of 20.92% beat Nokian Tyres PLC's return on equity of -2.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    66.22% $0.47 $244.1M
    NKRKY
    Nokian Tyres PLC
    8.83% -$0.14 $2.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About HRVFF or NKRKY?

    Harvia PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nokian Tyres PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia PLC has higher upside potential than Nokian Tyres PLC, analysts believe Harvia PLC is more attractive than Nokian Tyres PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    0 0 0
    NKRKY
    Nokian Tyres PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is HRVFF or NKRKY More Risky?

    Harvia PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nokian Tyres PLC has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.963%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock HRVFF or NKRKY?

    Harvia PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.96%. Nokian Tyres PLC offers a yield of 6.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Harvia PLC pays 52.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Nokian Tyres PLC pays out -315.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios HRVFF or NKRKY?

    Harvia PLC quarterly revenues are $54.7M, which are smaller than Nokian Tyres PLC quarterly revenues of $283.6M. Harvia PLC's net income of $8.8M is higher than Nokian Tyres PLC's net income of -$39.8M. Notably, Harvia PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Nokian Tyres PLC's PE ratio is 177.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia PLC is 5.58x versus 0.73x for Nokian Tyres PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    HRVFF
    Harvia PLC
    5.58x 40.92x $54.7M $8.8M
    NKRKY
    Nokian Tyres PLC
    0.73x 177.80x $283.6M -$39.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?

GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

Stock Ideas

Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 18

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.

Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18

Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 19.81% over the past day.

Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18

Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 17.85% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock