CNDHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 54.15%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.84%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.615%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $325M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Assured Guaranty's net income of $176M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 4.69x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Axis Capital Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 13.22%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 15.06%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Axis Capital Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $113.13 which suggests that it could grow by 17.94%. Given that Axis Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Axis Capital Holdings is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.813, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.732%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Axis Capital Holdings offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Axis Capital Holdings pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $194.1M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Axis Capital Holdings's PE ratio is 9.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 1.34x for Axis Capital Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 4.96%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.96 which suggests that it could grow by 19.9%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.307%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.82x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 10.35%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $24.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $781.7M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 6.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.91x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.