EG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 54.15%. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.84%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.96, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than Everest Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.615%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $325M. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than Assured Guaranty's net income of $176M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.82x versus 4.69x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Conduit Holdings has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of --. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.96, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand Conduit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Conduit Holdings offers a yield of 5.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings pays out 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than Conduit Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while Conduit Holdings's PE ratio is 7.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.82x versus 1.32x for Conduit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 10.35%. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.96, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $24.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $781.7M. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 6.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.82x versus 0.91x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusPoint has a net margin of 4.96% compared to Everest Group's net margin of 8.45%. Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97% beat SiriusPoint's return on equity of 6.95%.

Everest Group has a consensus price target of $397.96, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand SiriusPoint has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.93%. Given that SiriusPoint has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe SiriusPoint is more attractive than Everest Group.

Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, which suggesting that the stock is 49.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusPoint has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.893%.

Everest Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. SiriusPoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everest Group pays 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusPoint pays out 8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everest Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than SiriusPoint quarterly revenues of $729.4M. Everest Group's net income of $210M is higher than SiriusPoint's net income of $61.6M. Notably, Everest Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.07x while SiriusPoint's PE ratio is 19.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everest Group is 0.82x versus 1.11x for SiriusPoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.