AXS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 13.22% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 54.15%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 15.06% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.84%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $113.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.94%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.615%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $325M. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $194.1M is higher than Assured Guaranty's net income of $176M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.52x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.34x versus 4.69x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 13.22% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of --. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 15.06% beat Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $113.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.94%. On the other hand Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Axis Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Axis Capital Holdings is more attractive than Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd..

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Axis Capital Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $194.1M is higher than Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.52x while Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.34x versus -- for Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group has a net margin of 13.22% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 4.96%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 15.06% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $113.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.94%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.96 which suggests that it could grow by 19.9%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Axis Capital Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Axis Capital Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.307%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $194.1M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.52x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.34x versus 0.82x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 13.22% compared to Axis Capital Holdings's net margin of 4.92%. Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 15.06% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of $113.13, signalling upside risk potential of 17.94%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $280.09 which suggests that it could grow by 17.09%. Given that Axis Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Axis Capital Holdings is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.299, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.149%.

Axis Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Axis Capital Holdings pays 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $194.1M is higher than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M. Notably, Axis Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.52x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 7.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Axis Capital Holdings is 1.34x versus 0.97x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.