RNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 54.15%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.84%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $280.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Assured Guaranty has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Assured Guaranty is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.615%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $325M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is lower than Assured Guaranty's net income of $176M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.97x versus 4.69x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Axis Capital Holdings has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 13.22%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat Axis Capital Holdings's return on equity of 15.06%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $280.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand Axis Capital Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $113.13 which suggests that it could grow by 17.94%. Given that Axis Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Axis Capital Holdings is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Axis Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.813, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.732%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Axis Capital Holdings offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Axis Capital Holdings pays out 16.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Axis Capital Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is lower than Axis Capital Holdings's net income of $194.1M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while Axis Capital Holdings's PE ratio is 9.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.97x versus 1.34x for Axis Capital Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hiscox has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat Hiscox's return on equity of 18.17%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $280.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand Hiscox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RenaissanceRe Holdings has higher upside potential than Hiscox, analysts believe RenaissanceRe Holdings is more attractive than Hiscox.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hiscox has a beta of 0.336, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.438%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Hiscox offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hiscox pays out 20.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Hiscox quarterly revenues of --. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is higher than Hiscox's net income of --. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while Hiscox's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.97x versus 1.63x for Hiscox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusPoint has a net margin of 4.92% compared to RenaissanceRe Holdings's net margin of 8.45%. RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 9.77% beat SiriusPoint's return on equity of 6.95%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a consensus price target of $280.09, signalling upside risk potential of 17.09%. On the other hand SiriusPoint has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.93%. Given that SiriusPoint has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe SiriusPoint is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusPoint has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.893%.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. SiriusPoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusPoint pays out 8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than SiriusPoint quarterly revenues of $729.4M. RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of $170M is higher than SiriusPoint's net income of $61.6M. Notably, RenaissanceRe Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.63x while SiriusPoint's PE ratio is 19.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RenaissanceRe Holdings is 0.97x versus 1.11x for SiriusPoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.