UBER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of -9.99%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $98.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.87%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $479.85 which suggests that it could grow by 2%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.732%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.28x versus 28.21x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 36.37%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Intuit's return on equity of 18.57%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $98.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.87%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $804.19 which suggests that it could grow by 7.8%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Intuit.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.481%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Intuit quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is lower than Intuit's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Intuit's PE ratio is 60.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.28x versus 11.68x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 36.86%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $98.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.87%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $533.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Microsoft.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.28x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Uber Technologies's net margin of 21.55%. Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65% beat Oracle's return on equity of 85.26%.

Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $98.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.87%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $225.70 which suggests that it could fall by -6.47%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Oracle.

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.493%.

Uber Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Uber Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uber Technologies quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $15.9B. Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Uber Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Oracle's PE ratio is 55.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uber Technologies is 4.28x versus 12.05x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.