MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 15.68%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $533.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $349.52 which suggests that it could grow by 35.5%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.456%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.07x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 40.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.99x versus 6.48x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -9.99%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $533.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $479.85 which suggests that it could grow by 2%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.157, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.732%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.07x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.99x versus 28.21x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 3.24%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $533.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $143.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3.23%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Datadog.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.629%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.07x while Datadog's PE ratio is 302.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.99x versus 17.70x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 36.86% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 3.04%. Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7% beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $533.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.57%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $296.88 which suggests that it could grow by 30.94%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.675% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.122%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $70.1B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Microsoft's net income of $25.8B is higher than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.07x while Workday's PE ratio is 125.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 13.99x versus 7.02x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.