QXO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of 64.81% compared to QXO's net margin of 36.86%. QXO's return on equity of 1.13% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

QXO has a consensus price target of $33.2000, signalling upside risk potential of 56.68%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $533.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that QXO has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe QXO is more attractive than Microsoft.

QXO has a beta of 2.398, which suggesting that the stock is 139.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

QXO has a quarterly dividend of $26.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. QXO pays 177.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but QXO's is not.

QXO quarterly revenues are $13.5M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. QXO's net income of $8.8M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, QXO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QXO is 115.55x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 64.81% compared to QXO's net margin of 21.55%. QXO's return on equity of 1.13% beat Oracle's return on equity of 85.26%.

QXO has a consensus price target of $33.2000, signalling upside risk potential of 56.68%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $225.70 which suggests that it could fall by -6.47%. Given that QXO has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe QXO is more attractive than Oracle.

QXO has a beta of 2.398, which suggesting that the stock is 139.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.493%.

QXO has a quarterly dividend of $26.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. QXO pays 177.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but QXO's is not.

QXO quarterly revenues are $13.5M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $15.9B. QXO's net income of $8.8M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.4B. Notably, QXO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 55.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QXO is 115.55x versus 12.05x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paychex has a net margin of 64.81% compared to QXO's net margin of 20.82%. QXO's return on equity of 1.13% beat Paychex's return on equity of 41.81%.

QXO has a consensus price target of $33.2000, signalling upside risk potential of 56.68%. On the other hand Paychex has an analysts' consensus of $147.44 which suggests that it could grow by 3.65%. Given that QXO has higher upside potential than Paychex, analysts believe QXO is more attractive than Paychex.

QXO has a beta of 2.398, which suggesting that the stock is 139.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paychex has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.929%.

QXO has a quarterly dividend of $26.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paychex offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. QXO pays 177.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex pays out 87.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but QXO's is not.

QXO quarterly revenues are $13.5M, which are smaller than Paychex quarterly revenues of $1.4B. QXO's net income of $8.8M is lower than Paychex's net income of $297.2M. Notably, QXO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paychex's PE ratio is 31.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QXO is 115.55x versus 9.24x for Paychex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 64.81% compared to QXO's net margin of 15.4%. QXO's return on equity of 1.13% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 69.65%.

QXO has a consensus price target of $33.2000, signalling upside risk potential of 56.68%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $98.80 which suggests that it could grow by 8.87%. Given that QXO has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe QXO is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

QXO has a beta of 2.398, which suggesting that the stock is 139.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.661%.

QXO has a quarterly dividend of $26.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QXO pays 177.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QXO quarterly revenues are $13.5M, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.5B. QXO's net income of $8.8M is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $1.8B. Notably, QXO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QXO is 115.55x versus 4.28x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.