MOG.A Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Moog's net margin of -0.19%. Moog's return on equity of 11.5% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Moog has a consensus price target of $213.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $235.93 which suggests that it could grow by 2.62%. Given that Moog has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Moog is more attractive than Boeing.

Moog has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.564%.

Moog has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Moog pays 17.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moog's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Moog quarterly revenues are $934.8M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Moog's net income of $55.8M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Moog's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.94x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Moog is 1.65x versus 2.26x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Moog's net margin of -49.46%. Moog's return on equity of 11.5% beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -47.64%.

Moog has a consensus price target of $213.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $36.96 which suggests that it could fall by -22.51%. Given that Moog has higher upside potential than Rocket Lab USA, analysts believe Moog is more attractive than Rocket Lab USA.

Moog has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Moog has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Moog pays 17.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moog's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Moog quarterly revenues are $934.8M, which are larger than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $122.6M. Moog's net income of $55.8M is higher than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$60.6M. Notably, Moog's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.94x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Moog is 1.65x versus 51.15x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Moog's net margin of 6.26%. Moog's return on equity of 11.5% beat Textron's return on equity of 11.79%.

Moog has a consensus price target of $213.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $87.05 which suggests that it could grow by 3.46%. Given that Moog has higher upside potential than Textron, analysts believe Moog is more attractive than Textron.

Moog has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.657%.

Moog has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. Textron offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Moog pays 17.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Moog quarterly revenues are $934.8M, which are smaller than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Moog's net income of $55.8M is lower than Textron's net income of $207M. Notably, Moog's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.94x while Textron's PE ratio is 19.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Moog is 1.65x versus 1.14x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XTI Aerospace has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Moog's net margin of -2659.5%. Moog's return on equity of 11.5% beat XTI Aerospace's return on equity of -440.92%.

Moog has a consensus price target of $213.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.35%. On the other hand XTI Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 581.82%. Given that XTI Aerospace has higher upside potential than Moog, analysts believe XTI Aerospace is more attractive than Moog.

Moog has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XTI Aerospace has a beta of 0.045, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.53%.

Moog has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.61%. XTI Aerospace offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Moog pays 17.12% of its earnings as a dividend. XTI Aerospace pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moog's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Moog quarterly revenues are $934.8M, which are larger than XTI Aerospace quarterly revenues of $484K. Moog's net income of $55.8M is higher than XTI Aerospace's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Moog's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.94x while XTI Aerospace's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Moog is 1.65x versus 0.75x for XTI Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.