LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 9.2%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 13.18%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.18, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $21.76 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.107, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.294%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 7.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 58.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $256M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.12x versus 0.79x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 4.48%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -17.08%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.18, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $77.72 which suggests that it could fall by -10.05%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than The Estee Lauder Companies, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than The Estee Lauder Companies.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.463%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of $159M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.12x versus 2.11x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 6.45%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat General Mills's return on equity of 24.24%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.18, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $55.72 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.692%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than General Mills's net income of $294M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.12x versus 1.43x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 11.72%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $63.18, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.01 which suggests that it could grow by 11.27%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.461, which suggesting that the stock is 53.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.349, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.098%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.12x versus 2.17x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.