CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 9.2% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 6.45%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 13.18% beat General Mills's return on equity of 24.24%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $21.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.28%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $55.72 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than General Mills.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.692%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Conagra Brands pays 58.07% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $256M is lower than General Mills's net income of $294M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.79x versus 1.43x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 9.2% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 11.87%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 13.18% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $21.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.28%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 16.08%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Conagra Brands pays 58.07% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $256M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.79x versus 1.29x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WK Kellogg has a net margin of 9.2% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 2.72%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 13.18% beat WK Kellogg's return on equity of 17.67%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $21.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.28%. On the other hand WK Kellogg has an analysts' consensus of $22.03 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. WK Kellogg offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Conagra Brands pays 58.07% of its earnings as a dividend. WK Kellogg pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than WK Kellogg quarterly revenues of $663M. Conagra Brands's net income of $256M is higher than WK Kellogg's net income of $18M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while WK Kellogg's PE ratio is 36.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.79x versus 0.76x for WK Kellogg. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 9.2% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -34.01%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 13.18% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $21.76, signalling upside risk potential of 14.28%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $110.74 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than JM Smucker.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.107, which suggesting that the stock is 89.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.139%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. Conagra Brands pays 58.07% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out -37% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Conagra Brands's net income of $256M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$729M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.79x versus 1.27x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.