GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Campbell's has a net margin of 6.45% compared to General Mills's net margin of 2.67%. General Mills's return on equity of 24.24% beat The Campbell's's return on equity of 11.74%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $55.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand The Campbell's has an analysts' consensus of $37.72 which suggests that it could grow by 21.84%. Given that The Campbell's has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe The Campbell's is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.003, which suggesting that the stock is 99.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Campbell's has a beta of 0.079, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.115%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. The Campbell's offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. General Mills pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Campbell's pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than The Campbell's quarterly revenues of $2.5B. General Mills's net income of $294M is higher than The Campbell's's net income of $66M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while The Campbell's's PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.43x versus 0.91x for The Campbell's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 6.45% compared to General Mills's net margin of 11.87%. General Mills's return on equity of 24.24% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $55.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 16.08%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.003, which suggesting that the stock is 99.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. General Mills pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. General Mills's net income of $294M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.43x versus 1.29x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 6.45% compared to General Mills's net margin of 10.24%. General Mills's return on equity of 24.24% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $55.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $147.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.38%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than PepsiCo.

General Mills has a beta of 0.003, which suggesting that the stock is 99.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.552%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. General Mills pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. General Mills's net income of $294M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.43x versus 2.01x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 6.45% compared to General Mills's net margin of -34.01%. General Mills's return on equity of 24.24% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $55.72, signalling upside risk potential of 11.42%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $110.74 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than JM Smucker.

General Mills has a beta of 0.003, which suggesting that the stock is 99.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.139%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.82%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. General Mills pays 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out -37% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.1B. General Mills's net income of $294M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$729M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.20x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.43x versus 1.27x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.