LEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dana has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of 1.06%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat Dana's return on equity of -2.06%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $110.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.16%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $22.57 which suggests that it could grow by 33.32%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than Lear.

Lear has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.299%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Dana offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Lear's net income of $80.7M is higher than Dana's net income of $25M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.49x while Dana's PE ratio is 147.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.26x versus 0.25x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of -3528.43%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Lear has a consensus price target of $110.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.16%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Lear.

Lear has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Lear's net income of $80.7M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.49x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.26x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of 3.75%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 8.82%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $110.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.16%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.98%. Given that Strattec Security has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe Strattec Security is more attractive than Lear.

Lear has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.917%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Lear's net income of $80.7M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.49x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.26x versus 0.46x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of 6.96%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $110.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.16%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $110.42 which suggests that it could grow by 0.59%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Lear has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.227%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. Lear's net income of $80.7M is higher than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.49x while Visteon's PE ratio is 10.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.26x versus 0.79x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.