DAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Dana's net margin of 0.5%. Dana's return on equity of -2.06% beat American Axle & Mfg Holdings's return on equity of 3.59%.

Dana has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 33.32%. On the other hand American Axle & Mfg Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.56 which suggests that it could grow by 14.58%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than American Axle & Mfg Holdings, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than American Axle & Mfg Holdings.

Dana has a beta of 2.093, which suggesting that the stock is 109.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a beta of 1.542, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.198%.

Dana has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. American Axle & Mfg Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dana pays -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. American Axle & Mfg Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dana quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than American Axle & Mfg Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dana's net income of $25M is higher than American Axle & Mfg Holdings's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Dana's price-to-earnings ratio is 147.33x while American Axle & Mfg Holdings's PE ratio is 28.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dana is 0.25x versus 0.10x for American Axle & Mfg Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BorgWarner has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Dana's net margin of 4.47%. Dana's return on equity of -2.06% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77%.

Dana has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 33.32%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of $39.27 which suggests that it could grow by 11.66%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than BorgWarner.

Dana has a beta of 2.093, which suggesting that the stock is 109.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.934%.

Dana has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Dana pays -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dana quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Dana's net income of $25M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $157M. Notably, Dana's price-to-earnings ratio is 147.33x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 28.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dana is 0.25x versus 0.56x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Dana's net margin of 1.45%. Dana's return on equity of -2.06% beat Lear's return on equity of 9.86%.

Dana has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 33.32%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $110.94 which suggests that it could grow by 4.16%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than Lear.

Dana has a beta of 2.093, which suggesting that the stock is 109.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.194%.

Dana has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Lear offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Dana pays -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dana quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Dana's net income of $25M is lower than Lear's net income of $80.7M. Notably, Dana's price-to-earnings ratio is 147.33x while Lear's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dana is 0.25x versus 0.26x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OmniTek Engineering has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Dana's net margin of -7.41%. Dana's return on equity of -2.06% beat OmniTek Engineering's return on equity of --.

Dana has a consensus price target of $22.57, signalling upside risk potential of 33.32%. On the other hand OmniTek Engineering has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9159.26%. Given that OmniTek Engineering has higher upside potential than Dana, analysts believe OmniTek Engineering is more attractive than Dana.

Dana has a beta of 2.093, which suggesting that the stock is 109.299% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OmniTek Engineering has a beta of -0.130, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.023%.

Dana has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. OmniTek Engineering offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dana pays -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. OmniTek Engineering pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dana quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than OmniTek Engineering quarterly revenues of $359.8K. Dana's net income of $25M is higher than OmniTek Engineering's net income of -$26.7K. Notably, Dana's price-to-earnings ratio is 147.33x while OmniTek Engineering's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dana is 0.25x versus 0.26x for OmniTek Engineering. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.