ALSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of -3528.43%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.11, signalling upside risk potential of 16.91%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.43x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 0.13%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 26.12%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.11, signalling upside risk potential of 16.91%. On the other hand Douglas Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $33.67 which suggests that it could grow by 16.25%. Given that Allison Transmission Holdings has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, analysts believe Allison Transmission Holdings is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.59%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Douglas Dynamics offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics pays out 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are larger than Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues of $115.1M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Douglas Dynamics's net income of $148K. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Douglas Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.43x versus 1.15x for Douglas Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 3.75%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 8.82%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.11, signalling upside risk potential of 16.91%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.98%. Given that Allison Transmission Holdings has higher upside potential than Strattec Security, analysts believe Allison Transmission Holdings is more attractive than Strattec Security.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.917%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.43x versus 0.46x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 25.07% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 6.96%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 48.56% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $104.11, signalling upside risk potential of 16.91%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $110.42 which suggests that it could grow by 0.59%. Given that Allison Transmission Holdings has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Allison Transmission Holdings is more attractive than Visteon.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.227%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $766M, which are smaller than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $192M is higher than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.31x while Visteon's PE ratio is 10.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.43x versus 0.79x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.