VC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of -2.54%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 0.59%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 112.77%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.11%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Visteon's net income of $65M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.79x versus 0.09x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 11.33%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 17.2%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 0.59%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.31%. Given that Dorman Products has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Dorman Products is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.269%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are larger than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $507.7M. Visteon's net income of $65M is higher than Dorman Products's net income of $57.5M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 17.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.79x versus 1.83x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of -3528.43%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 0.59%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Visteon's net income of $65M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.79x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 1.45%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Lear's return on equity of 9.86%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 0.59%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $110.94 which suggests that it could grow by 4.16%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.212, which suggesting that the stock is 21.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.194%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lear offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than Lear's net income of $80.7M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Lear's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.79x versus 0.26x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.