KOP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chemours has a net margin of -3.05% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -0.29%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 5.01% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 4.67%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 83.42%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $15.11 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than The Chemours.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.486, which suggesting that the stock is 48.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.152%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. The Chemours offers a yield of 6.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Chemours's is not.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $456.5M, which are smaller than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$13.9M is lower than The Chemours's net income of -$4M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.97x while The Chemours's PE ratio is 69.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.33x versus 0.34x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingevity has a net margin of -3.05% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of 7.22%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 5.01% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -118.15%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 83.42%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $54.25 which suggests that it could grow by 19.26%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than Ingevity.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.486, which suggesting that the stock is 48.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.291%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $456.5M, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $284M. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$13.9M is lower than Ingevity's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.97x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.33x versus 1.23x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -3.05% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 5.01% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 83.42%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.486, which suggesting that the stock is 48.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $456.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$13.9M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.97x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.33x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -3.05% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 5.01% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 83.42%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.486, which suggesting that the stock is 48.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $456.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$13.9M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.97x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.33x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.