NGVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innospec has a net margin of 7.22% compared to Ingevity's net margin of 7.44%. Ingevity's return on equity of -118.15% beat Innospec's return on equity of 2.21%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Innospec has an analysts' consensus of $115.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.28%. Given that Innospec has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Innospec is more attractive than Ingevity.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innospec has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.676%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innospec offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec pays out 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $284M, which are smaller than Innospec quarterly revenues of $440.8M. Ingevity's net income of $20.5M is lower than Innospec's net income of $32.8M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innospec's PE ratio is 80.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.25x versus 1.20x for Innospec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Koppers Holdings has a net margin of 7.22% compared to Ingevity's net margin of -3.05%. Ingevity's return on equity of -118.15% beat Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 5.01%.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Koppers Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $59.50 which suggests that it could grow by 84.44%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than Ingevity.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.637%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Koppers Holdings offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings pays out 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $284M, which are smaller than Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues of $456.5M. Ingevity's net income of $20.5M is higher than Koppers Holdings's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Koppers Holdings's PE ratio is 27.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.25x versus 0.33x for Koppers Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.22% compared to Ingevity's net margin of --. Ingevity's return on equity of -118.15% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Ingevity.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $284M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Ingevity's net income of $20.5M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.25x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.22% compared to Ingevity's net margin of --. Ingevity's return on equity of -118.15% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Ingevity has a consensus price target of $54.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Ingevity.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.383, which suggesting that the stock is 38.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Ingevity has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingevity pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ingevity quarterly revenues are $284M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Ingevity's net income of $20.5M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Ingevity's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingevity is 1.25x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.