GHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jernigan Capital has a net margin of 43.06% compared to Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net margin of --. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 3.48% beat Jernigan Capital's return on equity of --.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.56%. On the other hand Jernigan Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has higher upside potential than Jernigan Capital, analysts believe Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is more attractive than Jernigan Capital.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jernigan Capital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.6%. Jernigan Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays 175.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Jernigan Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are larger than Jernigan Capital quarterly revenues of --. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of $3.3M is higher than Jernigan Capital's net income of --. Notably, Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.33x while Jernigan Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is 7.85x versus -- for Jernigan Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LM Funding America has a net margin of 43.06% compared to Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net margin of -1396.68%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 3.48% beat LM Funding America's return on equity of -43.69%.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.56%. On the other hand LM Funding America has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 39.32%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LM Funding America has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.848%.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.6%. LM Funding America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays 175.97% of its earnings as a dividend. LM Funding America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are larger than LM Funding America quarterly revenues of $386.5K. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of $3.3M is higher than LM Funding America's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.33x while LM Funding America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is 7.85x versus 1.60x for LM Funding America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navient has a net margin of 43.06% compared to Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net margin of -1.28%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 3.48% beat Navient's return on equity of 2.08%.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.56%. On the other hand Navient has an analysts' consensus of $14.65 which suggests that it could grow by 3.68%. Given that Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is more attractive than Navient.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navient has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.47%.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.6%. Navient offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays 175.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient pays out 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's is not.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than Navient quarterly revenues of $156M. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of $3.3M is higher than Navient's net income of -$2M. Notably, Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.33x while Navient's PE ratio is 28.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is 7.85x versus 1.83x for Navient. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 43.06% compared to Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net margin of 16.52%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 3.48% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 22.25%.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 32.56%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $82.89 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has higher upside potential than PayPal Holdings, analysts believe Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is more attractive than PayPal Holdings.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.594, which suggesting that the stock is 40.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.557%.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.6%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays 175.97% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of $3.3M is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.33x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is 7.85x versus 2.37x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.