NAVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Encore Capital Group has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Navient's net margin of 11.91%. Navient's return on equity of 2.08% beat Encore Capital Group's return on equity of -12.64%.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand Encore Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.25 which suggests that it could grow by 47.86%. Given that Encore Capital Group has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe Encore Capital Group is more attractive than Navient.

Navient has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Encore Capital Group has a beta of 1.592, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.227%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Encore Capital Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Navient pays 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Encore Capital Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $156M, which are smaller than Encore Capital Group quarterly revenues of $392.8M. Navient's net income of -$2M is lower than Encore Capital Group's net income of $46.8M. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.26x while Encore Capital Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.83x versus 0.68x for Encore Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jernigan Capital has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Navient's net margin of --. Navient's return on equity of 2.08% beat Jernigan Capital's return on equity of --.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand Jernigan Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Navient has higher upside potential than Jernigan Capital, analysts believe Navient is more attractive than Jernigan Capital.

Navient has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jernigan Capital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. Jernigan Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Navient pays 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Jernigan Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $156M, which are larger than Jernigan Capital quarterly revenues of --. Navient's net income of -$2M is higher than Jernigan Capital's net income of --. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.26x while Jernigan Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.83x versus -- for Jernigan Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LM Funding America has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Navient's net margin of -1396.68%. Navient's return on equity of 2.08% beat LM Funding America's return on equity of -43.69%.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand LM Funding America has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 39.32%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Navient.

Navient has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LM Funding America has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.848%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. LM Funding America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Navient pays 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. LM Funding America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $156M, which are larger than LM Funding America quarterly revenues of $386.5K. Navient's net income of -$2M is higher than LM Funding America's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.26x while LM Funding America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.83x versus 1.60x for LM Funding America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Navient's net margin of 16.52%. Navient's return on equity of 2.08% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 22.25%.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.68%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $82.89 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Navient.

Navient has a beta of 1.405, which suggesting that the stock is 40.47% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.557%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.53%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Navient pays 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $156M, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Navient's net income of -$2M is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.26x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.83x versus 2.37x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.