LMFA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a net margin of -1396.68% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of 43.06%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -43.69% beat Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 3.48%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 39.32%. On the other hand Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 32.56%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.594, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.594%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP offers a yield of 12.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays out 175.97% of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $386.5K, which are smaller than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues of $7.7M. LM Funding America's net income of -$5.4M is lower than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of $3.3M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's PE ratio is 24.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 1.60x versus 7.85x for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jernigan Capital has a net margin of -1396.68% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of --. LM Funding America's return on equity of -43.69% beat Jernigan Capital's return on equity of --.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 39.32%. On the other hand Jernigan Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Jernigan Capital, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Jernigan Capital.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jernigan Capital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jernigan Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jernigan Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $386.5K, which are larger than Jernigan Capital quarterly revenues of --. LM Funding America's net income of -$5.4M is higher than Jernigan Capital's net income of --. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jernigan Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 1.60x versus -- for Jernigan Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navient has a net margin of -1396.68% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -1.28%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -43.69% beat Navient's return on equity of 2.08%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 39.32%. On the other hand Navient has an analysts' consensus of $14.65 which suggests that it could grow by 3.68%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Navient.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navient has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.47%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Navient offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient pays out 53.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $386.5K, which are smaller than Navient quarterly revenues of $156M. LM Funding America's net income of -$5.4M is lower than Navient's net income of -$2M. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Navient's PE ratio is 28.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 1.60x versus 1.83x for Navient. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of -1396.68% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of 16.52%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -43.69% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 22.25%.

LM Funding America has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 39.32%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $82.89 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than PayPal Holdings, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than PayPal Holdings.

LM Funding America has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.557%.

LM Funding America has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LM Funding America pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America quarterly revenues are $386.5K, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. LM Funding America's net income of -$5.4M is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.3B. Notably, LM Funding America's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America is 1.60x versus 2.37x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.