GGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of -1%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 67.96%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.947%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $36.8M. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$370K. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.55x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.93x versus 0.40x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flowserve has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of 6.46%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $64.30 which suggests that it could grow by 19.54%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.968%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $73.9M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.55x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.93x versus 1.54x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of -814.55%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graco has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Graco is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Graco has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.662%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.55x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.93x versus 9.39x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 23.49% compared to Graco's net margin of -7.32%. Graco's return on equity of 19.79% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.6%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.12%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 1.065, which suggesting that the stock is 6.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0099999999999989%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $528.3M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Graco's net income of $124.1M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.55x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.93x versus 0.41x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.