BWEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -1% compared to Broadwind's net margin of 4.33%. Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 409.55%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, which suggesting that the stock is 43.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.804%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $36.8M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.3M. Broadwind's net income of -$370K is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $360K. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.43x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.40x versus 0.72x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -1% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -814.55%. Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, which suggesting that the stock is 43.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.662%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $36.8M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Broadwind's net income of -$370K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.43x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.40x versus 9.39x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Solutions International has a net margin of -1% compared to Broadwind's net margin of 14.09%. Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23% beat Power Solutions International's return on equity of 184.91%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand Power Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could fall by -22.22%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, which suggesting that the stock is 43.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.022%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Solutions International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $36.8M, which are smaller than Power Solutions International quarterly revenues of $135.4M. Broadwind's net income of -$370K is lower than Power Solutions International's net income of $19.1M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.43x while Power Solutions International's PE ratio is 23.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.40x versus 3.67x for Power Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -1% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -7.32%. Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.33, signalling upside risk potential of 67.96%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.12%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, which suggesting that the stock is 43.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0099999999999989%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $36.8M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Broadwind's net income of -$370K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.43x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.40x versus 0.41x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.