CVNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CarMax has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of 2.79%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat CarMax's return on equity of 8.98%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $322.92, signalling downside risk potential of -8.27%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $85.26 which suggests that it could grow by 36.65%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.589, which suggesting that the stock is 258.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.686%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Carvana's net income of $216M is higher than CarMax's net income of $210.4M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.52x while CarMax's PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 3.24x versus 0.36x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of 2.28%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.88%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $322.92, signalling downside risk potential of -8.27%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $393.16 which suggests that it could grow by 18.7%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.589, which suggesting that the stock is 258.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.904%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 7.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Carvana's net income of $216M is higher than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.52x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 10.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 3.24x versus 0.24x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of 1.93%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat Sonic Automotive's return on equity of 24.38%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $322.92, signalling downside risk potential of -8.27%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $72.44 which suggests that it could fall by -18.2%. Given that Sonic Automotive has more downside risk than Carvana, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Sonic Automotive.

Carvana has a beta of 3.589, which suggesting that the stock is 258.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.188%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonic Automotive offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive pays out 18.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Sonic Automotive quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Carvana's net income of $216M is higher than Sonic Automotive's net income of $70.6M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.52x while Sonic Automotive's PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 3.24x versus 0.21x for Sonic Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair has a net margin of 5.1% compared to Carvana's net margin of -4.14%. Carvana's return on equity of 61.46% beat Wayfair's return on equity of --.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $322.92, signalling downside risk potential of -8.27%. On the other hand Wayfair has an analysts' consensus of $48.10 which suggests that it could fall by -13.14%. Given that Wayfair has more downside risk than Carvana, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Wayfair.

Carvana has a beta of 3.589, which suggesting that the stock is 258.942% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair has a beta of 2.973, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.329%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Wayfair quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Carvana's net income of $216M is higher than Wayfair's net income of -$113M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 123.52x while Wayfair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 3.24x versus 0.58x for Wayfair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.