KMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 2.79% compared to CarMax's net margin of 9.29%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.98% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 47.83%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $85.26, signalling upside risk potential of 36.65%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $229.61 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

CarMax has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.058%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 62.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are larger than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.3B. CarMax's net income of $210.4M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $303.8M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 23.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.36x versus 2.04x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 2.79% compared to CarMax's net margin of 2.33%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.98% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 16.4%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $85.26, signalling upside risk potential of 36.65%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $470.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

CarMax has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.719%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are larger than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. CarMax's net income of $210.4M is higher than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $128.1M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.36x versus 0.28x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of 2.79% compared to CarMax's net margin of 8.02%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.98% beat Openlane's return on equity of 9.57%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $85.26, signalling upside risk potential of 36.65%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $24.50 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Openlane.

CarMax has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.721%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are larger than Openlane quarterly revenues of $460.1M. CarMax's net income of $210.4M is higher than Openlane's net income of $36.9M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Openlane's PE ratio is 42.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.36x versus 1.48x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 2.79% compared to CarMax's net margin of -11.23%. CarMax's return on equity of 8.98% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -51.41%.

CarMax has a consensus price target of $85.26, signalling upside risk potential of 36.65%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -72.05%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

CarMax has a beta of 1.377, which suggesting that the stock is 37.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.975%.

CarMax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CarMax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -0.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

CarMax quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.7M. CarMax's net income of $210.4M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, CarMax's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CarMax is 0.36x versus 3.40x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.