CRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ATI has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 8.48%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat ATI's return on equity of 22.94%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $312.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand ATI has an analysts' consensus of $89.91 which suggests that it could grow by 0.14%. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than ATI.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ATI has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.859%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. ATI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. ATI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are smaller than ATI quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is lower than ATI's net income of $97M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while ATI's PE ratio is 32.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.85x versus 2.93x for ATI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 5.54%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $312.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.85x versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of -8.6%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $312.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.94%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.201%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 25.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.85x versus 0.58x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 6.47%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 21.59% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $312.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.71%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.19 which suggests that it could fall by -8.88%. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than Kennametal.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.390, which suggesting that the stock is 38.988% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.400, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.029%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $727M, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $95.4M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.56x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 4.85x versus 0.96x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.