ATI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of 6.47%. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $89.91, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.19 which suggests that it could fall by -8.88%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Kennametal.

ATI has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.400, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.029%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.93x versus 0.96x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of 2.85%. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.21%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $89.91, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.67%. Given that Proto Labs has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe Proto Labs is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.113%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $126.2M. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of $3.6M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 65.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.93x versus 1.97x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of --. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

ATI has a consensus price target of $89.91, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7217.07%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.769%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.93x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 8.48% compared to ATI's net margin of 2.41%. ATI's return on equity of 22.94% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15%.

ATI has a consensus price target of $89.91, signalling upside risk potential of 0.14%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $86.14 which suggests that it could grow by 23.92%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than ATI, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than ATI.

ATI has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.876%.

ATI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. ATI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

ATI quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.7B. ATI's net income of $97M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M. Notably, ATI's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.53x while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is 28.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATI is 2.93x versus 0.69x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.