SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 17.71%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 28.27%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $86.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $183.10 which suggests that it could fall by -0.65%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.002%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $344M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.84x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 60.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.69x versus 9.99x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 6.47%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 8.43%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $86.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.19 which suggests that it could fall by -8.88%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Kennametal.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.400, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.029%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $486.4M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.84x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 17.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.69x versus 0.96x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 7.56%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $86.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $148.93 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than RTX.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.001%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. RTX offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.84x while RTX's PE ratio is 44.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.69x versus 2.48x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap-on has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 21.08%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15% beat Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $86.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand Snap-on has an analysts' consensus of $322.39 which suggests that it could grow by 3%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Snap-on.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap-on has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.331%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Snap-on offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on pays out 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Snap-on quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M is lower than Snap-on's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.84x while Snap-on's PE ratio is 16.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.69x versus 3.58x for Snap-on. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.