WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astronics has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 4.63%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Astronics's return on equity of -1.37%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $266.31, signalling upside risk potential of 5%. On the other hand Astronics has an analysts' consensus of $38.58 which suggests that it could grow by 12.26%. Given that Astronics has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Astronics is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astronics has a beta of 1.550, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.006%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Astronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Astronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are larger than Astronics quarterly revenues of $205.9M. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is higher than Astronics's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.98x while Astronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.65x versus 1.57x for Astronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of -8.6%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $266.31, signalling upside risk potential of 5%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.61%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.201%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.98x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.65x versus 0.58x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Solutions and Support has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 24.33%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Innovative Solutions and Support's return on equity of 23.24%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $266.31, signalling upside risk potential of 5%. On the other hand Innovative Solutions and Support has an analysts' consensus of $10.90 which suggests that it could fall by -25.95%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than Innovative Solutions and Support, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than Innovative Solutions and Support.

Woodward has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Solutions and Support has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.523%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. Innovative Solutions and Support offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Solutions and Support pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are larger than Innovative Solutions and Support quarterly revenues of $21.9M. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is higher than Innovative Solutions and Support's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.98x while Innovative Solutions and Support's PE ratio is 25.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.65x versus 4.12x for Innovative Solutions and Support. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 7.56%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $266.31, signalling upside risk potential of 5%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $148.93 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Woodward has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Woodward is more attractive than RTX.

Woodward has a beta of 1.258, which suggesting that the stock is 25.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.001%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.42%. RTX offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.98x while RTX's PE ratio is 44.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.65x versus 2.48x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.