SWBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GMS has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 1.96%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 3.56% beat GMS's return on equity of 8%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand GMS has an analysts' consensus of $108.75 which suggests that it could fall by -1.18%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than GMS, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than GMS.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GMS has a beta of 1.713, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.253%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.36%. GMS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 172.04% of its earnings as a dividend. GMS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $140.8M, which are smaller than GMS quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $9.7M is lower than GMS's net income of $26.1M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.30x while GMS's PE ratio is 38.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.77x versus 0.79x for GMS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -16.81%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 3.56% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49528300.95%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.375%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.36%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 172.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $140.8M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $9.7M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.30x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.77x versus 0.02x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 15.29%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 3.56% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.361, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.929%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.36%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 172.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands's is not.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $140.8M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $23.3M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $9.7M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.30x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 19.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.77x versus 3.37x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 5.72%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 3.56% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.71%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.43%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.949, which suggesting that the stock is 5.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.395%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.36%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 172.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands's is not.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $140.8M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $135.7M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $9.7M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $7.8M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.30x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 19.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.77x versus 1.14x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.