OFLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of -16.81%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49528300.95%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.361, which suggesting that the stock is 63.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.375%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.39x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.37x versus 0.02x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 7.4%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gorman-Rupp has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.13%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.361, which suggesting that the stock is 63.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.339%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Gorman-Rupp offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues of $163.9M. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is lower than Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.39x while Gorman-Rupp's PE ratio is 21.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.37x versus 1.46x for Gorman-Rupp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 6.92%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 3.56%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.7%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.361, which suggesting that the stock is 63.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.086%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 6.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 172.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Smith & Wesson Brands's is not.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $140.8M. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is lower than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $9.7M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.39x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 30.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.37x versus 0.77x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 8.17%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.53%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $142.07 which suggests that it could grow by 8.93%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.361, which suggesting that the stock is 63.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.974%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 39.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is lower than Xylem's net income of $169M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.39x while Xylem's PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.37x versus 3.70x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.