GMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 1.96% compared to GMS's net margin of 5.54%. GMS's return on equity of 8% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

GMS has a consensus price target of $108.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GMS has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe GMS is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

GMS has a beta of 1.713, which suggesting that the stock is 71.253% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. GMS's net income of $26.1M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.08x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.79x versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker Hannifin has a net margin of 1.96% compared to GMS's net margin of 19.37%. GMS's return on equity of 8% beat Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 26.88%.

GMS has a consensus price target of $108.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand Parker Hannifin has an analysts' consensus of $735.74 which suggests that it could grow by 3.59%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than GMS, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than GMS.

GMS has a beta of 1.713, which suggesting that the stock is 71.253% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.739%.

GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Parker Hannifin offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues of $5B. GMS's net income of $26.1M is lower than Parker Hannifin's net income of $960.9M. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.08x while Parker Hannifin's PE ratio is 27.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.79x versus 4.68x for Parker Hannifin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of 1.96% compared to GMS's net margin of -104.71%. GMS's return on equity of 8% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77%.

GMS has a consensus price target of $108.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $37.59 which suggests that it could fall by -18.44%. Given that NuScale Power has more downside risk than GMS, analysts believe GMS is more attractive than NuScale Power.

GMS has a beta of 1.713, which suggesting that the stock is 71.253% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $13.4M. GMS's net income of $26.1M is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$14M. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.08x while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.79x versus 98.93x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 1.96% compared to GMS's net margin of 6.92%. GMS's return on equity of 8% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 3.56%.

GMS has a consensus price target of $108.75, signalling downside risk potential of -1.18%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.7%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than GMS, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than GMS.

GMS has a beta of 1.713, which suggesting that the stock is 71.253% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.949, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.086%.

GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 6.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 172.04% of its earnings as a dividend.

GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $140.8M. GMS's net income of $26.1M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $9.7M. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.08x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 30.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.79x versus 0.77x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.