ILAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group's net margin of 11.12%. Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39% beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62%.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,078.61 which suggests that it could grow by 3.75%. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.282%.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of -- is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 26.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group is 1.35x versus 2.94x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group's net margin of 10.33%. Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39% beat Masco's return on equity of 939.57%.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $70.60 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.649%.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Masco quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of -- is lower than Masco's net income of $186M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Masco's PE ratio is 17.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group is 1.35x versus 1.83x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group's net margin of --. Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intelligent Living Application Group has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Intelligent Living Application Group is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of -- is lower than Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is 0.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group is 1.35x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of -- compared to Intelligent Living Application Group's net margin of 2.22%. Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.48%.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $212.51 which suggests that it could grow by 6.7%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.374%.

Intelligent Living Application Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Intelligent Living Application Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of -- is lower than WESCO International's net income of $118.4M. Notably, Intelligent Living Application Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WESCO International's PE ratio is 15.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intelligent Living Application Group is 1.35x versus 0.46x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.