GWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Masco has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 10.33%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat Masco's return on equity of 939.57%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,078.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.75%. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $70.60 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.649%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Masco offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Masco quarterly revenues of $1.8B. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than Masco's net income of $186M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while Masco's PE ratio is 17.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.94x versus 1.83x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ozop Energy Solutions has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of -3685%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat Ozop Energy Solutions's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,078.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.75%. On the other hand Ozop Energy Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Ozop Energy Solutions, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Ozop Energy Solutions.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ozop Energy Solutions has a beta of -3.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 445.395%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Ozop Energy Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ozop Energy Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Ozop Energy Solutions quarterly revenues of $42.3K. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than Ozop Energy Solutions's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while Ozop Energy Solutions's PE ratio is 4.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.94x versus 1.45x for Ozop Energy Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of --. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,078.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.75%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is 0.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.94x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 11.12% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 2.22%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.48%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,078.61, signalling upside risk potential of 3.75%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $212.51 which suggests that it could grow by 6.7%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.282% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.374%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.3B. W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M is higher than WESCO International's net income of $118.4M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.69x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 15.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.94x versus 0.46x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.