EOSE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hayward Holdings has a net margin of -3696.73% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises's net margin of 6.26%. Eos Energy Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.91%.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.49%. On the other hand Hayward Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.93 which suggests that it could grow by 10.54%. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises is more attractive than Hayward Holdings.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a beta of 2.006, which suggesting that the stock is 100.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hayward Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eos Energy Enterprises quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are smaller than Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues of $228.8M. Eos Energy Enterprises's net income of $15.1M is higher than Hayward Holdings's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hayward Holdings's PE ratio is 26.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises is 70.54x versus 2.99x for Hayward Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco has a net margin of -3696.73% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises's net margin of 10.33%. Eos Energy Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat Masco's return on equity of 939.57%.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.49%. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $70.60 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises has higher upside potential than Masco, analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises is more attractive than Masco.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a beta of 2.006, which suggesting that the stock is 100.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.649%.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eos Energy Enterprises quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are smaller than Masco quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Eos Energy Enterprises's net income of $15.1M is lower than Masco's net income of $186M. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Masco's PE ratio is 17.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises is 70.54x versus 1.83x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of -3696.73% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises's net margin of --. Eos Energy Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.49%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a beta of 2.006, which suggesting that the stock is 100.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eos Energy Enterprises quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. Eos Energy Enterprises's net income of $15.1M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of $9.2M. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is 0.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises is 70.54x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of -3696.73% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises's net margin of 2.22%. Eos Energy Enterprises's return on equity of -- beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.48%.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a consensus price target of $6.67, signalling upside risk potential of 31.49%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $212.51 which suggests that it could grow by 6.7%. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises has higher upside potential than WESCO International, analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises is more attractive than WESCO International.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a beta of 2.006, which suggesting that the stock is 100.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.374%.

Eos Energy Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eos Energy Enterprises quarterly revenues are $10.5M, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Eos Energy Enterprises's net income of $15.1M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $118.4M. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WESCO International's PE ratio is 15.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises is 70.54x versus 0.46x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.