FLUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amprius Technologies has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of -83.05%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96% beat Amprius Technologies's return on equity of -68.79%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 161.54%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could grow by 26.14%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than Amprius Technologies, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than Amprius Technologies.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $16.7M, which are larger than Amprius Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.3M. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M is higher than Amprius Technologies's net income of -$9.4M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amprius Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.52x versus 26.98x for Amprius Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EnerSys has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of 9.9%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 161.54%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $105.36 which suggests that it could grow by 17.69%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than EnerSys.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.288%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $16.7M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $974.8M. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $96.5M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EnerSys's PE ratio is 9.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.52x versus 1.00x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of -71.96%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 161.54%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 71.23%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than NeoVolta, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than NeoVolta.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of -0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.77%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $16.7M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $2M. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M is lower than NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.52x versus 34.33x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tecogen has a net margin of -11.58% compared to Flux Power Holdings's net margin of -9.07%. Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96% beat Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16%.

Flux Power Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 161.54%. On the other hand Tecogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -22.15%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than Tecogen.

Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.392, which suggesting that the stock is 39.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tecogen has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.02%.

Flux Power Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tecogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flux Power Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues are $16.7M, which are larger than Tecogen quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M is lower than Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K. Notably, Flux Power Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tecogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flux Power Holdings is 0.52x versus 6.07x for Tecogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.