ENS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 10.94%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9.46%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $142.83 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Emerson Electric.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.288% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.431%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are smaller than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.4B. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $485M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 33.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.97x versus 4.55x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -11.58%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.10 which suggests that it could grow by 142.86%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.288% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.22%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.7M. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.97x versus 0.56x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -71.96%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 64.47%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.288% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of -0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.77%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $2M. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is higher than NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.97x versus 35.75x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -147.12%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Plug Power.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.073, which suggesting that the stock is 7.288% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.257%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 0.97x versus 2.04x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.