TGEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ideal Power has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Tecogen's net margin of -22519.57%. Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -55.02%.

Tecogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -25.99%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could fall by -30.58%. Given that Ideal Power has more downside risk than Tecogen, analysts believe Tecogen is more attractive than Ideal Power.

Tecogen has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.462%.

Tecogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tecogen quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $12K. Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K is higher than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Tecogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecogen is 6.38x versus 480.97x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Tecogen's net margin of -147.12%. Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Tecogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -25.99%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Tecogen.

Tecogen has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.257%.

Tecogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tecogen quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Tecogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecogen is 6.38x versus 2.04x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Tecogen's net margin of 3.68%. Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 3.96%.

Tecogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -25.99%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.79%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Tecogen.

Tecogen has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.474%.

Tecogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tecogen quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are smaller than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K is lower than Ultralife's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Tecogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 26.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecogen is 6.38x versus 0.83x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vertiv Holdings has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Tecogen's net margin of 8.08%. Tecogen's return on equity of -38.16% beat Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 33.83%.

Tecogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -25.99%. On the other hand Vertiv Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $126.34 which suggests that it could grow by 0.75%. Given that Vertiv Holdings has higher upside potential than Tecogen, analysts believe Vertiv Holdings is more attractive than Tecogen.

Tecogen has a beta of 0.990, which suggesting that the stock is 1.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.748, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.84%.

Tecogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vertiv Holdings offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Tecogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings pays out 8.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecogen quarterly revenues are $7.3M, which are smaller than Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Tecogen's net income of -$659.9K is lower than Vertiv Holdings's net income of $164.5M. Notably, Tecogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vertiv Holdings's PE ratio is 72.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecogen is 6.38x versus 5.76x for Vertiv Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.